| |
Back
Articles By Gandhi
A Himalayan
Miscalculation
April 14, 1919
Almost
immediately after the Ahmedabad meeting I went to Nadiad. It was here that I
first used the expression 'Himalayan miscalculation' which obtained such a wide
currency afterwards. Even at Ahmedabad I had begun to have a dim perception of
my mistake. But when I reached Nadiad and saw the actual state of things there
and heard reports about a large number of people from Kheda district having been
arrested, it suddenly dawned upon me that I had committed a grave error in
calling upon the people in the Kheda district and elsewhere to launch upon civil
disobedience prematurely, as it now seemed to me. I was addressing a public
meeting. My confession brought down upon me no small amount of ridicule. But I
have never regretted having made that confession. For I have always held that it
is only when one sees one's own mistakes with a convex lens, and does just the
reverse in the case of others, that one is able to arrive at a just relative
estimate of the two. I further believe that a scrupulous and conscientious
observance of this rule is necessary for one who wants to be a Satyagrahi.
Let us
now see what the Himalayan miscalculation was. Before one can be fit for the
practice of civil disobedience one must have rendered a willing and respectful
obedience to the state laws. For the most part we obey such laws out of fear of
the penalty for their breach, and this holds good particularly in respect of
such laws as do not involve a moral principal. For instance, an honest,
respectable man will not suddenly take to stealing, whether there is a law
against stealing or not, but this very man will not feel any remorse for failure
to observe the rule about carrying head-lights on bicycles after dark. Indeed it
is doubtful whether he would even accept advice kindly about being more careful
in this respect. But he would observe any obligatory rule of this kind, if only
to escape the inconvenience of facing a prosecution for a breach of the rule.
Such compliance is not, however, the willing and spontaneous obedience that is
required of a Satyagrahi. A Satyagrahi obeys the laws of society intelligently
and of his own free will, because he considers it to be his sacred duty to do
so. It is only when a person has thus obeyed the laws of society scrupulously
that he is in a position to judge as to which particular rules are good and just
and which are unjust and iniquitous. Only then does the right accrue to him of
the civil disobedience of certain laws in well-defined circumstances. My error
lay in my failure to observe this necessary limitation. I had called on the
people to launch upon civil disobedience before they had thus qualified
themselves for it, and this mistake seemed to me Himalayan magnitude. As soon as
I entered the Kheda district, all the old recollections of the Kheda Satyagraha
struggle came back to me, and I wondered how I could have failed to perceive
what was so obvious. I realized that before a people could be fit for offering
civil disobedience, they should thoroughly understand its deeper implications.
That being so, before re-starting civil disobedience on a mass scale, it would
be necessary to create a band of well-tried, pure-hearted volunteers who
thoroughly understood the strict conditions of Satyagraha. They could explain
these to the people, and by sleepless vigilance keep them on the right path.
With
these thoughts filling my mind I reached Bombay, raised a corps of Satyagrahi
volunteers through the Satyagraha Sabha there, and with their help commenced the
work of educating the people with regard to the meaning and inner significance
of Satyagraha. This was principally done by issuing leaflets of an educative
character bearing on the subject.
But
whilst this work was going on, I could see that it was a difficult task to
interest the people in the peaceful side of Satyagraha. The volunteers too
failed to enlist themselves in large numbers. Nor did all those who actually
enlisted take anything like a regular systematic training, and as the days
passed by, the number of fresh recruits began gradually to dwindle instead of to
grow. I realized that the progress of the training in civil disobedience was not
going to be as rapid as I first expected.
|
|
 |