| |
Back
Gandhi's Views On Environment
Modern Civilization
Gandhiji wrote to Sir Danial Hamilton in a letter on
15-2-1922 from Bardoli:
"India does not need to be industrialized in the modem sense of the term. It has
7,50,000 villages scattered over a vast area 1,900 miles long, 1,500 broad. The
people are rooted to the soil, and the vast majority are living a hand-to-mouth
life. Whatever may be said to the contrary, having travelled throughout the
length and breadth of the land with eyes open and having mixed with millions,
there can be no doubt that pauperism is growing. There is no doubt also that the
millions are living in enforced idleness for at least 4 months in the year.
Agriculture does not need revolutionary changes. The Indian peasant requires a
supplementary industry. The most natural is the introduction of the spinning
wheel, not the handloom. The latter cannot be introduced in every home, whereas
the former can, and it used to be so even a century ago. It was driven out not
by economic pressure, but by force deliberately used as can be proved from
authentic records. The restoration therefore, of the spinning-wheel solves the
economic problem of India at a stroke. . . It is the most effective force for
introducing successful co-operative societies. Without honest co-operation of
the millions, the enterprise can never be successful, and as it is already
proving a means of weaning thousands of women from a life of shame, it is as
moral an instrument as it is economic. . .I hope you will not allow yourself to
be prejudiced by anything you might have heard about my strange views about
machinery. I have nothing to say against the development of any other industry
in India by means of machinery, but I do say that to supply India with cloth
manufactured either outside or inside through gigantic mills is an economic
blunder of the first magnitude, just as it would be to supply cheap bread
through huge bakeries established in the chief centres in India and to destroy.
the family stove."
* * *
Clarifying his views on objection to machinery Gandhiji wrote in a letter dated
4-10-1929 to Giri Raj from Gorakhpore camp:
". . .
The main consideration about machinery is that it should not displace the labour
of those who cannot otherwise be employed. You will find that this one argument
answers all objections. We do not want to displace hand processes. We want to
cultivate hand processes to perfection but where it is found to be absolutely
necessary let us not hesitate to introduce machinery. Do you know that some of
the most delicate life-saving appliances would have been impossible without the
aid of some machinery? After all the simple Charkha is also a machine. What we
must dread is huge machinery run not by hand but by non-human power such as
steam, electricity, etc. But even this need not be tabooed."
* * *
Discarding the possibility of adopting urban civilization Gandhiji firmly
expressed his views, in Young India on 7-11-1929:
". . . In
my opinion the two questions are intertwined and both can be solved, if the
youth can be persuaded to make village life their goal rather than city life. We
are inheritors of a rural civilization. The vastness of our country, the
vastness of the population, the situation and the climate of the country have,
in my opinion, destined it for a rural civilization. Its defects are well known
but not one of them is irremediable. To uproot it and substitute for it an urban
civilization seems to me an impossibility, unless we are prepared by some
drastic means to reduce the population from three hundred million to three or
say even thirty. I can therefore suggest remedies on the assumption that we must
perpetuate the present rural civilization and endeavour to rid it of its
acknowledged defects. This can only be done if the youth of the country will
settle down to village life. . ."
* * *
Gandhiji
expressed his views in Harijan on 7-9-1934 regarding urbanization of India:
". . . It
is a process of double drain from the villages. Urbanization in India is slow
but sure death for her villages and villagers. Urbanization can never support
ninety per cent of India's population, which is living in her 7,00,000 villages.
To remove from these villages tanning and such other industries is to remove
what little opportunity there still is for making skilled use of the hand and
head. And when the village handicrafts disappear, the villagers working only
with their cattle on the field, with idleness for six or four months in the
year, must, in the words of Madhusudan Das, be reduced to the level of the beast
and be without proper nourishment, either of the mind or the body, and,
therefore, without joy and without hope.
"Here is
work for the cent-per-cent Swadeshi-lover and scope for the harnessing of
technical skill to the solution of a great problem. The work fells three apples
with one throw. It serves the Harijans, it serves the villagers and it means
honourable employment for the middle-class intelligentsia who are in search of
employment. Add to this the fact that the intelligentsia have a proper
opportunity of coming in direct touch with the villagers."
* * *
|
|
 |