| |
Back
Gandhi's Views On God
Ramanama
My
Saviour
THOUGH MY reason and heart long ago realized the highest attribute and name
of God as Truth, I recognize Truth by the name of Rama. In the darkest hour of
my trial, that one name has saved me and is still saving me. It may be the
association of childhood, it may be the fascination that Tulsidas has wrought on
me.
But the potent fact is there, and as I write these lines, my memory revives the
scenes of my childhood, when I used daily to visit the Ramji Mandir adjacent to
my ancestral home. My Rama then resided there. He saved me from many fears and
sins. It was no superstition for me. The custodian of the idol may have been a
bad man. I know nothing against him. Misdeeds might have gone on in the temple.
Again I know nothing of them. Therefore, they would not affect me. What was and
is true of me is true of millions of Hindus. (H, 18-3-1933, p6)
When
a child, my nurse taught me to repeat Ramanama whenever I felt afraid or
miserable, and it has been second nature with me with growing knowledge and
advancing years. I may even say that the Word is in my heart, if not actually on
my lips, all the twenty-four hours. It has been by saviour and I am ever stayed
on it. In the spiritual literature of the world, the Ramayana of Tulsidas takes
a foremost place. It has charms that I miss in the Mahabharata and even in
Valmiki's Ramayana. (H, 17-8-1934, p213)
Best
Worship
I myself have been a devotee of Tulasidas from my childhood and have,
therefore, always worshipped God as Rama. But I know that if, beginning with
Omkar, one goes through the entire gamut of God's names current in all climes,
all countries and languages, the result is the same. He and His law are one. To
observe His law is, therefore, the best form of worship. (H, 24-3-1946, p56)
One
God
I laugh within myself when someone objects that Rama or the chanting of
Ramanama is for the Hindus only, how can Mussalmans therefore take part in it?
Is there one God for the Mussalmans and another for the Hindus, Paris or
Christians? No, there is only one omnipotent and omnipresent God. He is named
variously and we remember Him by the name which is most familiar to us.
My Rama, the Rama of our prayers is not the historical Rama, the son Dasharatha,
the King of Ayodhya. He is the eternal, the unborn, the one without a second.
Him alone I worship. His aid alone I see, and so should you. He belongs equally
to all. I, therefore, see no reason why a Mussalman or anybody should object to
taking His name. But he is in no way bound to recognize God as Ramanama. He may
utter to himself Allah or Khuda so as not to mar the harmony of the sound. (H,
28-4-1946, p111)
To
me...Rama, described as the Lord of Sita, son of Dasharatha, is the all-powerful
essence whose name, inscribed in the heart, removes all suffering--mental, moral
and physical. (H, 2-6-1946, p158)
Curative
Power
An apt question is as to why a man who recites Ramanama regularly and leads
a pure life should ever fall ill. Man is by nature imperfect. A thoughtful man
strives after perfection, but never attains it. He stumbles on the way, however
unwittingly. The whole of God's law is embodied in a pure life.
The first thing s to realize one's limitations. It should be obvious that, the
moment one transgresses those limits, one falls ill. Thus a balanced diet eaten
in accordance with needs gives one freedom from disease. How is one to know what
is the proper diet for one? Many such enigmas can be imagined. The purport of it
all is that everyone should be his own doctor and find out his limitations. The
man who does so will surely live up to 125. (H, 19-5-1946, p148)
Ramanama
cannot perform the miracle of restoring to you a lost limb. But it can perform
the still greater miracle of helping you to enjoy an ineffable peace in spite of
the loss while you live and rob death of its sting and the grave its victory at
the journey's end. Since death must come soon or late to everyone, why should
one worry over the time? (H, 7-4-1946, p69)
The
practice of nature cure does not require high academic qualifications or much
erudition. Simplicity is the essence of universality. Nothing that is meant for
the benefit of the millions requires much erudition. The latter can be acquired
only by the few and, therefore, can benefit the rich only.
But India lives in her seven lakhs of villages-obscure, tiny, out-of-the-way
villages, where the population in some cases hardly exceeds a few hundred, very
often not even a few score.
I would like to go and settle down in some such village. That is real India, my
India, You cannot take to these humble people that paraphernalia of highly
qualified doctors and hospital equipment. In simple, natural remedies and
Ramanama lies their only hope. (ibid)
Purity
of Thought
Mere lip recitation of Ramanama has nothing to do with cure. Faith cure, if
I know it correctly, is blind cure, such as the friend describes and thereby
ridicules the living name of the living God. The latter is not a figment of
one's imagination. It has to come from the heart.
It is conscious belief in God and a knowledge of His law that make perfect cure
possible without any further aid. That law is that a perfect mind is responsible
for perfect health of he body. A perfect mind comes from a perfect heart, not
the heart known by a doctor's stethoscope but the heart which is the seat of
God. It is claimed that realization of God in the heart makes it impossible for
an impure or an idle thought to cross the mind.
Disease is impossible where there is purity of thought. Such a state may be
difficult to attain. But the first step in the ascent to health is taken with
its recognition. The next is taken when the corresponding attempt is made. This
radical alteration in one's life is naturally accompanied by the observance of
all other nature's laws hitherto discovered by man. One cannot play with them
and claim to have a pure heart.
It can be said with justice that possession of a pure heart should do equally
well without Ramanama. Only, I know no other way of attaining purity. And it is
the way trodden by the seas of old all over the world. They were men of God, not
suppositious men or charlatans. (H, 9-6-1946, p171)
Spiritual
force is like any other force at the service of man. Apart from the fact that it
has been used for physical ailments for ages, with more or less success, it
would be intrinsically wrong not to use it, if it can be successfully used for
the cure of physical ailments. For, man is both matter and spirit, each acting
on and affecting the other.
If you get rid of malaria by taking quinine, without thinking of the millions
who do not get it, why should you refuse to use the remedy which is within you,
because millions will not use it through their ignorance?
May you not be clean and well because millions of others will not be so,
ignorantly or, may be even cussedly? If you will not be clean out of false
notions of philanthropy, you will deny yourself the duty of serving the very
millions by remaining dirty and ill. Surely refusal to be spiritually well or
clean is worse than the refusal to be physically clean and well. (H, 1-9-1946,
p286)
I
To repeat Ramanama and to follow the way of Ravana in actual practice is worse
than useless. It is sheer hypocrisy. One may deceive oneself or the world, but
one cannot deceive oneself or the world, but one cannot deceive the Almighty.
(H, 23-6-1946, p186)
Source
: From the book "Mind of Mahatma Gandhi"
|
|
 |
