| |
Back
Gandhi's Views On Satyagraha
The Kheda Struggle
No breathing time was, however, in
store for me. Hardly was the Ahmedabad mill-hands' strike over, when I had to
plunge into the Kheda Satyagraha struggle.
A condition approaching famine had
arisen in the Kheda district owing to a widespread failure of crops, and the
Patidars of Kheda were considering the question of getting the revenue
assessment for the year suspended.
Sjt. Amritlal Thakkar had already
inquired into and reported on the situation and personally discussed the
question with the Commissioner, before I gave definite advice to the
cultivators. Sjts. Mohanlal Pandya and Shankarlal Parikh had also thrown
themselves into the fight, and had set up an agitation in the Bombay Legislative
Council through Sjt. Vithalbhai Patel and the late Sir Gokuldas Kahandas Parekh.
More than one deputation had waited upon the Governor in that connection.
I was at this President of the
Gujarat Sabha. The Sabha sent petitions and telegrams to the Government and even
patiently swallowed the insults and threats of the Commissioner. The conduct of
the officials on this occasion was so ridiculous and undignified as to be almost
incredible now.
The cultivators' demand was as clear
as daylight, and so moderate as to make out a strong case for its acceptance.
Under the Land Revenue Rules, if the crop was four annas or under, the
cultivators could claim full suspension of the revenue assessment for the year.
According to the official figures the crop was said to be over four annas. The
contention of the cultivators, on the other hand, was that it was less than four
annas. But the Government was in on mood to listen, and regarded the popular
demand for arbitration as #lese majeste#. At last all petitioning and prayer
having failed, after taking counsel with co-workers, I advised the Patidars ro
resort to Satyagraha.
Besides the volunteers of Kheda, my
principal comrades in this struggle were Sjts. Vallabhbhai Patel, Shankarlal
Banker, Shrimati Anasuyabehn, Sjts. Indulal Yajnik, Mahadev Desai and others.
Sjt. Vallabhbhai, in joining the struggle, had to suspend a splendid and growing
practice at the bar, which for all practical purposes he was never able to
resume.
We fixed up our headquarters at the Nadiad Anathashram, no other place being
available which would have been large enough to accommodate all of us.
The following pledge was signed by the Satyagrahis:
'Knowing that the crops of our villages are less than four annas, we requested
the Government to suspend the collection of revenue assessment till the ensuing
year, but the Government had not acceded to our prayer. Therefore, we, the
undersigned, hereby solemnly declare that we shall not, of our own accord, pay
to the Government the full or the remaining revenue for the year. We shall let
the Government take whatever legal steps it may think fit and gladly suffer the
consequences of our non-payment. We shall rather let our lands be forfeited than
that by voluntary payment we should allow our case to be considered flase or
should compromise our self-respect. Should the Government, however, agree to
suspend collection of the second installment of the assessment throughout the
district, such amongst us as are in a position to pay will pay up the whole or
the balance of the revenue that may be due. The reason why those who are able to
pay still withhold payment is that, if they pay up, the poorer ryots may in a
panic sell their chattels or incur debts to pay their dues, and thereby bring
suffering upon themselves. In these circumstances we feel that, for the sake of
the poor, it is the duty even of those who can afford to pay to withhold payment
of their assessment.'
I cannot devote many chapters to this struggle. So a number of sweet
recollections in this connection will have to be crowded out. Those who want to
make a fuller and deeper study of this important fight would do well to read the
full and authentic history of the Kheda Satyagraha by Sjt. Shankarlal Parikh of
Kathlal, Kheda.
The campaign came to an unexpected
end. It was clear that the people were exhausted, and I hesitated to let the
unbending be driven to utter ruin. I was casting about for some graceful way of
terminating the struggle which would be acceptable to a Satyagrahi. Such a one
appeared quite unexpectedly. The Mamlatdar of the Nadiad Taluka sent me word
that, if well-to-do Patidars paid up, the poorer ones would be granted
suspension. I asked for a written undertaking to that effect, which was given.
But as a Mamlatdar could be responsible only for his Taluka, I inquired of the
Collector, who alone could give an undertaking in respect of the whole district,
whether the Mamlatdar's undertaking was true for the whole district. He replied
that orders declaring suspension in terms of the Mamlatdar's letter had been
already issued. I was not aware of it, but if it was a fact, the people's pledge
had been fulfilled. The pledge, it will be remembered, had the same things for
its object, and so we expressed ourselves satisfied with the orders.
However, the end was far from making me feel happy, inasmuch as it lacked the
grace with which the termination of every Satyagraha campaign ought to be
accompanied. The Collector carried on as though he had done nothing by way of a
settlement. The poor were to be granted suspension, but hardly any got the
benefit of it. It was the people's right to determine who was poor, but they
could not exercise it. I was sad that they had not the strength to exercise the
right. Although, therefore, the termination was celebrated as a triumph of
Satyagraha, I could not enthuse over it, as it lacked the essentials of a
complete triumph.
The end of a Satyagraha campaign can be described as worthy, only when, it
leaves the Satyagrahis stronger and more spirited than they are in the
beginning.
The campaign was not, however, without its indirect results which we can see
today and the benefit of which we are reaping. The Kheda Satyagraha marks the
beginning of an awakening among the peasants of Gujarat, the beginning of their
true political education.
Dr. Besant's brilliant Home Rule agitation had certainly touched the peasants,
but it was the Kheda campaign that compelled the educated public workers to
establish contact with the actual life of the peasants. They learnt to identify
themselves with the latter. They found their proper sphere of work, their
capacity for sacrifice increased. That Vallabhbhai found himself during this
campaign was by itself no small achievement. We could realize its measure during
the flood relief operations last year and the Bardoli Satyagraha this year.
Public life in Gujarat became instinct with a new energy and a new vigor. The
Patidar peasant came to an unforgettable consciousness of his strength. The
lesson was indelibly imprinted on the public mind that the salvation of the
people depends upon themselves, upon their capacity for suffering and sacrifice.
Through the Kheda campaign Satyagraha took firm root in the soil of Gujarat.
Although, therefore, I found nothing
to enthuse over in the termination of the Satyagraha, the Kheda peasants were
jubilant, because they knew that what they had found the true and infallible
method for a redress of their grievances. This knowledge was enough
justification for their jubilation.
Nevertheless the Kheda peasants had
not fully understood the inner meaning of Satyagraha, and they saw it to their
cost.
[Source: This article is taken from
the book "The selected works of Mahatma Gandhi"
Autobiography-(Vol. II, Navneet Publications, Ahmedabad, India]
Note: Kheda is a district place in Gujarat State in India
|
|
 |