| |
Back
FAQs
The Belligerence of Muslims was a result of
Gandhiji's Policy of Appeasement
With regard to the allegation regarding appeasement of
Muslims, it should be conceded that a certain amount of antagonism between
Hindus and Muslims existed in the nation. The colonial power cleverly exploited
it during its reign and inevitably the result the division of the country came
into being. Long before Gandhiji appeared on the national stage sagacious
leaders like B. G. Tilak had started attempts to secure the participation of
Muslims in the nationalist struggle. Under what came to be known as Lucknow pact
Lokmanya Tilak, Annie Besant and Mr. Jinnah evolved a formula under which the
Muslims would get representation greater than what would be justified on the
basis of the percentage of Muslim population. The frank and bold statement of
Tilak defending the Pact is an eloquent refutation of the charge that Gandhiji
began the policy of appeasement of Muslims. The author of the play "Mee Nathuram
Godse Boltoy", Shri Pradip Dalvi described the order of Maharashtra government
banning the staging of the play as an attack on freedom of expression. This is a
travesty of truth and perversion of the fundamental right guaranteed by the
constitution. The constitution also provides for ban on the abuse of this
freedom vide its section 19(2). The implications of what Shri Dalvi and ilk
profess requires to be carefully analyzed. Under the guise of defending the
freedom of expression what they are seeking to do is to advocate the right to
murder those who do not agree with them; they seek to spread hatred and
violence; they want to propagate the pernicious doctrine that under certain
circumstances the murder of the opponent becomes an act of religious sacrifice.
It is revolting to find that the heinous murder of one who was a living
embodiment of non-violence, peace and love and who was as defenseless as a naked
new born child should be made a scaffolding for a neo-fascist doctrine.
Godse is no more but the mindset which gave birth to such distorted philosophy
is unfortunately still with us. One can dismiss what he did as an act of a
lunatic bigot. Assassination by itself is not as wicked as the attempts to
rationalize, justify masquerade it as religious act. Permitting such plays to be
staged amounts to permitting mis-education of our children. Only sane response to
such insidious propaganda is unequivocal rejection thereof.
***
|
|
 |